Skip to main content
Glama

get_pop

Retrieve POP configuration settings for Gmail accounts to enable email client setup and access management.

Instructions

Gets POP settings

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • src/index.ts:850-858 (registration)
    Registration of the 'get_pop' MCP tool. The inline handler function executes the tool logic by calling the shared handleTool helper, which authenticates via OAuth2 and invokes the Gmail API to retrieve POP settings for the user. No input parameters are required (empty schema).
    server.tool("get_pop",
      "Gets POP settings",
      {},
      async () => {
        return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
          const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.getPop({ userId: 'me' })
          return formatResponse(data)
        })
      }
  • The handler function for the 'get_pop' tool. It uses handleTool to perform OAuth2 validation and call gmail.users.settings.getPop API.
    async () => {
      return handleTool(config, async (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => {
        const { data } = await gmail.users.settings.getPop({ userId: 'me' })
        return formatResponse(data)
      })
    }
  • Shared helper function used by 'get_pop' (and other tools) to handle authentication, create Gmail client, execute the API call, and handle errors.
    const handleTool = async (queryConfig: Record<string, any> | undefined, apiCall: (gmail: gmail_v1.Gmail) => Promise<any>) => {
      try {
        const oauth2Client = queryConfig ? createOAuth2Client(queryConfig) : defaultOAuth2Client
        if (!oauth2Client) throw new Error('OAuth2 client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const credentialsAreValid = await validateCredentials(oauth2Client)
        if (!credentialsAreValid) throw new Error('OAuth2 credentials are invalid, please re-authenticate')
    
        const gmailClient = queryConfig ? google.gmail({ version: 'v1', auth: oauth2Client }) : defaultGmailClient
        if (!gmailClient) throw new Error('Gmail client could not be created, please check your credentials')
    
        const result = await apiCall(gmailClient)
        return result
      } catch (error: any) {
        return `Tool execution failed: ${error.message}`
      }
    }
  • Helper function to format API responses for MCP tool output.
    const formatResponse = (response: any) => ({ content: [{ type: "text", text: JSON.stringify(response) }] })
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states 'Gets POP settings', implying a read-only operation, but does not disclose behavioral traits like authentication requirements, rate limits, error conditions, or what happens if no settings exist. This is inadequate for a tool with zero annotation coverage.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is extremely concise ('Gets POP settings'), consisting of a single, front-loaded sentence with zero waste. It efficiently communicates the core action without unnecessary details, making it highly structured and to the point.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (simple read operation) but lack of annotations and no output schema, the description is incomplete. It does not explain what POP settings are, the return format, or any behavioral context, leaving significant gaps for an agent to understand and use the tool effectively.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so no parameter documentation is needed. The description does not add parameter semantics, but with no parameters, the baseline is 4 as it does not need to compensate for any gaps.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Gets POP settings' clearly states the verb ('Gets') and resource ('POP settings'), providing a basic purpose. However, it lacks specificity about what POP settings are retrieved (e.g., configuration, status) and does not distinguish it from sibling tools like 'get_imap' or 'update_pop', making it vague in context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, context, or exclusions, such as when to use 'get_pop' instead of 'update_pop' or other settings-related tools. This leaves usage unclear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nk900600/gmail-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server