get_expense
Retrieve a single expense record from Elorus by providing its unique ID.
Instructions
Fetch a single expense record by its Elorus ID.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The Elorus expense ID |
Retrieve a single expense record from Elorus by providing its unique ID.
Fetch a single expense record by its Elorus ID.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | The Elorus expense ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided. Description implies read operation ('Fetch') but does not explicitly state idempotency, permissions, or side effects. Adequate for a simple get-by-ID tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no redundant words, front-loaded with verb and resource.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool is simple (1 param, no output schema). Description covers purpose and key constraint. Could mention return format or error cases, but not strictly necessary.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with description 'The Elorus expense ID'. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema. Baseline score applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description clearly states verb 'Fetch', resource 'expense record', and scope 'single... by its Elorus ID'. Distinct from siblings like list_expenses or create_expense.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
Implicitly clear: use when you have a specific ID and need a single record. Lacks explicit exclusions or alternatives, but context from name and siblings suffices.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nikan/elorus-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server