elorus-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to elorus-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceRead-only MCP server for the Elorus invoicing platform, enabling natural language queries about invoices, contacts, expenses, payments, and products.10MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceHosted MCP server that enables AI assistants to manage clients, invoices, and expenses via the Invox API, supporting actions like drafting, sending, cancelling, and marking invoices as paid, as well as logging expenses and updating client information.-
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for Invoice Ninja v5 API. Enables AI assistants to manage clients, invoices, quotes, payments, and time tracking through natural language.3219 npm2MIT

docnova-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for e-invoice platforms. Enables natural language querying of invoices, partners, company data, and financial reports.1814 npm6MIT- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server for creating and fiscalizing invoices via solo.com.hr API. Enables AI agents to generate invoices, retrieve invoice details, list invoices, and check next invoice number.4MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server enabling AI assistants to manage invoices, contacts, products, and other accounting data through the Bukku API.6MIT
TDQS
Scored across 43 tools
Each tool targets a specific entity and action, with clear distinctions between similar tools (e.g., list_cash_payments vs list_cash_receipts, list_client_discussions vs list_private_notes). No two tools appear to have overlapping purposes.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., create_invoice, list_contacts, update_bill). Variations like apply_credit_note or void_invoice still adhere to the same structure.
With 43 tools, the server covers a comprehensive accounting domain, but the count exceeds the typical well-scoped range (3-15). While each tool is justified, the sheer number may overwhelm agents or indicate that some operations could be combined.
The tool surface covers core CRUD for invoices, bills, contacts, expenses, and products, with additional actions like void, export, and apply credits. However, some entities (credit notes, supplier credits, cash receipts/payments) lack dedicated get tools, and there are no delete tools (void is used as an alternative). The gaps are minor and do not severely hinder workflows.