Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to pocketbase-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      D
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server that provides sophisticated tools for interacting with PocketBase databases. This server enables advanced database operations, schema management, and data manipulation through the Model Context Protocol (MCP).
      14
      643 npm
      70
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that allows interaction with PocketBase databases, enabling record operations (fetch, list, create, update), file management, and schema migrations through natural language.
      22
      20 npm
      40
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for managing PocketBase database schemas and migrations via REST API. It enables users to generate and execute migrations for creating, modifying, and deleting collections and fields directly through MCP-compatible clients.
      20 npm
      MIT
    • -
      license
      B
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for PocketBase that provides both user and administrative functionality, enabling authentication, collection/record management, file operations, and system administration through a standardized interface.
      38
      3 npm
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A comprehensive server that enables advanced database operations with PocketBase, providing tools for collection management, record operations, user management, and database administration through the Model Context Protocol.
      643 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 55 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools pair a clear action with a distinct resource, and even similar prefixes like request_/confirm_ target clearly different auth workflows. The main ambiguity is between list_records, get_full_record_list, and get_first_record, which all retrieve records and differ only in pagination or convenience.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    The API is overwhelmingly consistent verb_noun snake_case, following list_, get_, create_, update_, delete_, request_, and confirm_ patterns. A few outliers like health_check, batch, auth_info, and impersonate break the pattern, but they are minor deviations in an otherwise coherent naming scheme.

    Tool Count1/5

    At 55 tools, this is an extremely large MCP surface for an agent to reason over, crossing the threshold where tool selection becomes a burden. Even though PocketBase is broad, this would be better split into focused servers for records, admin/settings, backups/logs, and auth.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool set covers collections, records, auth, superusers, settings, logs, backups, cron, and file handling with full CRUD and lifecycle coverage. The send_raw_request escape hatch also eliminates dead ends for any PocketBase endpoint not otherwise exposed.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues