Scored across 12 tools
Each tool serves a distinct interaction mode: single question, multi-turn conversation, comparing ducks, council, debate, iterative refinement, judging, voting, and administrative tasks. No two tools have overlapping purposes.
Tool names mix patterns: some use verb_duck (ask_duck, chat_with_duck), others use duck_noun (duck_council, duck_debate), and one lacks 'duck' entirely (clear_conversations). While readable, the inconsistency in prefixing and structure is notable.
12 tools perfectly cover the intended domain of multi-LLM interactions without being excessive. Each tool adds a unique capability, and the set feels well-scoped for the server's purpose.
The tool surface covers all major interaction styles (single, chat, compare, council, debate, iterative, judge, vote) plus administration. Minor gaps include lack of per-duck configuration or conversation clearing.