insert_child

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description must carry full behavioral transparency. It only states 'reparent a node' without explaining what happens to the old parent, whether the child is removed from previous parent, default position (append), or error conditions. Significant gaps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Extremely short (one sentence) but lacks critical information. Under-specification rather than conciseness. Could be expanded to include context and still be concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, so description should explain return values or success indicators. It does not. Also missing details on side effects, such as notification of reparenting or error handling. Incomplete for a tree-modifying operation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage for all 5 parameters with descriptions. Description adds no extra meaning beyond schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate. The 'index' parameter is briefly described in schema, but description doesn't clarify its effect.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The verb 'reparent' clearly indicates changing a node's parent. It distinguishes from 'move_node' (which may imply repositioning within same parent) but lacks explicit differentiation. Overall clear purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'move_node' or 'clone_node'. No mention of prerequisites (e.g., node must exist). The agent must infer usage from context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.