Skip to main content
Glama
neozhehan

Figma Edit MCP

Create Component Set

create_component_set

Combine multiple components into a component set with property definitions to create and manage variants in Figma.

Instructions

Combine components into a component set (variants) with property definitions.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
parentIdNoParent frame to place the set in
componentsYesArray of component objects
propertiesYesArray of property names (e.g. ['Size', 'State'])
parentNodeNameNoName of parent node (required if parentId provided, for verification)
componentSetNameNoName for the component set

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesID of the created component set
nameYesName of the component set
typeNoNode type (COMPONENT_SET)
warningNoWarning message if some properties could not be read
childCountNoNumber of variants in the set
variantPropertiesNoVariant properties definition
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide openWorldHint, but description does not clarify behavioral traits such as whether original components are modified or retained, or what side effects occur. Fails to add value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence is concise and front-loaded, but could be slightly expanded for completeness without losing brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 5 parameters, nested objects, and an output schema, the description is too minimal. It does not explain the combination process, constraints, or expected output, leaving significant gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description adds no extra meaning to parameters beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Combine' and resource 'components into a component set (variants) with property definitions', clearly distinguishing it from siblings like create_component or create_frame.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like create_component or create_frame. Does not mention prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/neozhehan/figma-edit-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server