Skip to main content
Glama
neozhehan

Figma Edit MCP

Rename Node

node_rename
Idempotent

Rename a Figma node by setting its name to an exact value. Provide the node ID, current name, and new name.

Instructions

Rename a node (sets name to an exact value).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesNew name for the node
nodeIdYesThe ID of the node to rename
nodeNameYesName of the node to modify

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
nameYesThe new name of the node
oldNameYesThe old name of the node
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare idempotentHint and openWorldHint. The description adds minimal extra behavior beyond stating it sets an exact name. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, direct sentence with no filler. The core action is front-loaded and every word contributes meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity and presence of an output schema, the description sufficiently conveys the action. However, it could mention any naming uniqueness constraints or effects on references.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is already described. The description restates the purpose but does not add new constraints or format details.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('renames') and the resource ('node'), with a parenthetical clarification that it sets an exact value. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like node_set_* or node_apply_style.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as node_apply_style or node_bind_variable. No prerequisites or exclusions are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/neozhehan/figma-edit-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server