Skip to main content
Glama
neozhehan

Figma Edit MCP

by neozhehan

create_component_instance

Instantiate a component in Figma by specifying position (x, y) and optionally selecting the component via key or node ID, and attaching it to a parent node.

Instructions

Create an instance of a component in Figma

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
componentKeyNoKey of the component to instantiate (for remote/library components)
componentIdNoNode ID of the component to instantiate (preferred for local components)
xYesX position
yYesY position
parentIdNoOptional parent node ID to append the instance to
parentNodeNameNoName of the parent node to verify against
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations present, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits beyond the basic action. It does not mention side effects, permissions, or what happens to the original component.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is very concise, using a single sentence. However, it could be expanded slightly to include important context without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the 6 parameters and lack of output schema or annotations, the description is insufficient. It fails to explain return values, error conditions, or how the two component identifiers relate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning to the parameters beyond what the schema already provides, e.g., no clarification on when to use componentKey vs componentId.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action: 'Create an instance of a component'. It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like create_component (which creates the component itself) and other creation tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as create_component, or how to choose between componentKey and componentId. No context for prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/neozhehan/figma-edit-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server