aaddyy_link_in_bio

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden and does well on economics and state: drafts are free, publishing costs 50¢, later updates 10¢, and the page can be switched live or paused. It omits auth requirements, what happens on failed payment or slug collision, and whether costs are refundable, but the cost/state disclosure is substantial.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single dense sentence that front-loads what the tool produces and tucks pricing at the end where it belongs. It is long for one sentence and reads like promotional copy, but every clause conveys actionable information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 7-parameter creation tool with zero annotation or output-schema support, the description covers purpose and monetization well but leaves the parameters largely unexplained, which is the main gap an agent would face when filling the call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0% across 7 parameters, so the schema provides no semantics at all. The description loosely implies content for bio, links, socials and photo, and 'your-id' hints at slug, but theme, backgroundColor and the string format for links/socials (no enum, no structure) are never explained.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb and resource: 'Build your own shareable bio page (like Linktree) at aaddyy.com/profile/your-id' with the artifacts produced (photo, bio, links, socials, QR code). It is clearly distinct from siblings like aaddyy_qr_code_generator or aaddyy_headshot_generator, though it never names an alternative directly.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use it (when you want a link-in-bio page) and includes cost context for drafting vs publishing, but gives no explicit when-to-use vs siblings, no prerequisites, and no exclusions. Usage must be inferred from the marketing-style copy.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.