aaddyy_article_generator

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry the full behavioral burden. It mentions credit consumption (~5 credits), which is useful, but says nothing about whether this is a synchronous or asynchronous operation, expected output format, permissions, or rate limits, leaving key behavioral traits undisclosed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence that front-loads the core purpose and includes a credit cost note. It is appropriately sized, though it could benefit from more detail given the complex schema.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 9 parameters, 0% schema coverage, no annotations, and no output schema, yet the description provides only one sentence and no parameter or behavioral details. This is completely inadequate to guide correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain any of the 9 parameters (tone, length, outline, audience, keywords, provider, includeImages, includeReferences). With 8 optional parameters completely undocumented, the description fails to compensate for the schema gap.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource ('Generate comprehensive, well-researched articles') and adds the differentiator 'SEO optimization'. It is clear what the tool does, though it doesn't explicitly distinguish itself from sibling tools like aaddyy_research_blog_writer or aaddyy_essay_writer.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No when-to-use guidance is provided. The description does not explain scenarios for choosing this tool over alternatives such as aaddyy_research_blog_writer or aaddyy_essay_writer, nor does it note any prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.