getDateRangeTaskList

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden. It uses 'Get' to imply a read-only operation, but it does not disclose other behavioral traits such as whether results are sorted, paginated, or limited in any way, nor does it mention any prerequisite conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no redundant words or filler. It communicates the essential purpose in a clear and direct manner.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool is simple with two well-documented parameters and no output schema. The description tells the agent what it does but does not explain the return format, error behavior, or any limits. This is minimum viable for a straightforward getter, but it leaves some gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already fully describes both parameters (start and end date as Unix timestamps), so baseline is 3. The description adds minimal extra meaning by stating 'within a date range', but it doesn't clarify inclusivity or formatting beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb ('Get'), resource ('calendar tasks'), and scope ('within a date range'). It distinguishes itself from sibling tools by targeting calendar tasks, which no other tool handles.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description clearly implies when to use it: when you need calendar tasks within a specified date range. It does not explicitly mention exclusions or alternatives, but the context is clear enough for an agent to select it over other getter tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.