gwas-mcp
Related Servers
Alternatives to gwas-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI-driven pharmacogenomic analysis by querying structured genetic variant, drug response, and disease risk data. Supports natural language questions about medications, traits, and health risks based on user genome data, with privacy-first local execution.1628 npm12MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables unified access to 110 life science APIs and databases, including genomics, proteomics, chemistry, literature, and clinical data. Users can query genes, proteins, compounds, pathways, and more through natural language.3MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to query clinical genomics databases, retrieve supporting literature, analyze population genetics, and visualize biological pathways.18MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for querying the GWAS Catalog (EBI/NHGRI), a curated catalog of genome-wide association studies. It enables AI agents to search and retrieve study data via natural language or direct tool calls.37 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceProvides programmatic access to curated SNP data by trait, enabling LLM-powered applications to search, interpret, and discover genetic variants.MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables querying genomics data from the Alliance of Genome Resources across model organisms including human, mouse, rat, zebrafish, fly, worm, yeast, and xenopus. Supports gene searches, disease associations, expression data, orthologs, phenotypes, and molecular interactions through natural language.2218 npmMIT
TDQS
Scored across 44 tools
Many tools have overlapping purposes: multiple search tools for genes/proteins (search_ensembl_gene, search_ncbi_gene, search_uniprot) and multiple protein annotation tools (get_protein_details, get_protein_interactions, get_interaction_network). This creates ambiguity for an agent trying to select the right tool.
Tool names follow a verb_noun pattern with underscores (e.g., annotate_snps, create_manhattan_plot). However, verbs are mixed (get_, search_, calculate_, create_), which is mostly consistent but not perfectly uniform. Minor deviations like 'calculate_genomic_inflation' vs 'ld_pruning' (no verb) reduce consistency slightly.
44 tools is high for a GWAS server. Many tools are for searching external databases (10+ search_* tools) that could be consolidated. The server's scope is broad, but the number seems excessive and could overwhelm agents.
The server covers core GWAS analysis (run_gwas, clump_snps, create_manhattan_plot) and post-GWAS annotation (annotate_snps, enrichment, protein interactions). However, missing meta-analysis, imputation, and fine-mapping tools. Many search tools duplicate functionality, so coverage is moderate.