plugin_repo.status

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description must disclose behavioral traits. It only states what the tool lists but does not mention side effects, permissions, or whether it is a read-only operation. The agent has no indication of safety or impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with six words. It is extremely concise and front-loaded. However, it could include just a bit more detail without becoming verbose, such as clarifying what 'states' means.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a zero-parameter tool with no output schema, the description is minimally complete. It conveys the basic purpose, but lacks details about the format or components of the returned data (e.g., what fields are included in the listing). Given the tool's simplicity, it is adequate but not rich.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has zero parameters, and description coverage is 100% (vacuous). The description adds meaning by specifying that the tool lists 'repositories and plugin states,' which explains what data the agent will receive, even though there are no parameters to document. Baseline for 0 params is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool lists plugin repositories and plugin states, with a specific verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like plugin_repo.check_updates or plugin_repo.plugin_action, which could lead to confusion about when to use this tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No usage guidance is provided. The description does not mention when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor does it specify any prerequisites or context for invocation.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.