plugin_repo.plugin_action

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It fails to mention whether this tool modifies the system or state, what side effects occur (e.g., plugin state changes), authentication needs, or error conditions. The description is minimal and incomplete.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence that succinctly states the tool's purpose. It is front-loaded and avoids unnecessary words, though it could be slightly more detailed without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With three required parameters, zero schema descriptions, no output schema, and no annotations, the description is severely inadequate. The agent cannot understand parameter meanings, valid actions, or tool behavior, leading to a high risk of incorrect invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the schema provides no descriptions for the three parameters. The description does not clarify what repository_path, plugin_path, or action refer to, nor does it give valid values for action (e.g., install, uninstall). This leaves the agent with insufficient information to correctly fill parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool runs install/uninstall/enable/disable actions on a repository plugin, specifying the verb and resource. However, it does not differentiate from sister tool plugin_repo.check_updates which may be a closely related sibling.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives like plugin.valid_commands or plugin.execute. There is no mention of prerequisites or exclusion criteria, leaving the agent to infer usage context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.