wp_get_settings
Retrieve safe WordPress site settings to inspect configuration without risk of modification.
Instructions
Read safe WordPress site settings
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve safe WordPress site settings to inspect configuration without risk of modification.
Read safe WordPress site settings
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description indicates a read operation ('Read safe') but provides no additional detail on permissions, rate limits, or side effects. With no annotations, the description bears the full burden and falls short.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence, front-loading the purpose. It could be slightly more informative without adding length.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema or annotations, the description should explain what 'site settings' includes and the return format. It does not, making it incomplete for a read tool.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has no parameters, so the description does not need to add parameter details. It is sufficient that it indicates the tool requires no input, though it could explicitly mention that.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool reads WordPress site settings, with a specific verb and resource. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like wp_get_page or wp_update_settings, which would elevate clarity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, such as other getters or the update counterpart. The description lacks context for tool selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/mpierre135/wp-mcp-control-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server