wp_elementor_duplicate_page

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must carry behavioral context. It does disclose remapping of element IDs, preservation of heading text, and the confirm requirement. However, it does not state whether the original page is left untouched, what 'safe mode' means, or what the operation returns.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three short sentences with no redundancy. The primary action and key constraint are front-loaded, and every sentence adds relevant information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations, no output schema, and low schema coverage, the description leaves safe mode, slug, title, and status undefined. It also omits side effects and return behavior, making it too incomplete for fully correct invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is only 20% (source_id). The description adds meaning for confirm ('required when safe mode is on') but leaves slug, title, and status unexplained, failing to compensate for the sparse schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear action ('Duplicate an Elementor page as a new draft') and a distinctive technical detail ('with remapped element IDs'). This differentiates it from siblings like wp_elementor_clone_element or wp_create_page.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives such as wp_create_page, wp_update_page, or wp_elementor_clone_element. The only operational note is 'confirm:true required when safe mode is on', which is a prerequisite, not a usage routing rule.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.