wp_get_media

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It only states the basic function without mentioning safety (e.g., read-only), side effects, authorization requirements, or rate limits. The agent learns nothing beyond the operation's purpose.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence with no wasted words. It is front-loaded with the core action. However, it could include more detail (e.g., what metadata includes) without becoming overly verbose, which prevents a perfect score.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (single required parameter, no output schema), the description covers the basic purpose. However, it lacks information about the return structure, error conditions, and the scope of 'metadata'. It is minimally adequate but has gaps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Since schema description coverage is 0%, the description should elaborate on the 'id' parameter but does not. It only implies 'id' identifies the media item, which is already obvious from the tool name and purpose. No additional meaning is added beyond the schema's type and required flag.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a single media item with metadata, using the verb 'Get' and specifying the resource 'media item'. It distinguishes from sibling tools like wp_list_media (list) and wp_delete_media (delete).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like wp_list_media or wp_get_post. No context on prerequisites or scenarios is given. Usage is only implied by the required 'id' parameter.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.