Skip to main content
Glama
mpeyal

kicad-forge

by mpeyal

Related Servers

Alternatives to kicad-forge

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP servers for KiCad schematic, PCB, symbol, footprint, and project automation, enabling AI-assisted electronic design via tools for read/write, analysis, and exports.
      109
      9
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides read-only MCP tools for parsing KiCad netlists and schematics, running evidence-based audits, and generating deterministic sizing and BOMs.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables KiCad CLI automation via MCP, providing tools for ERC, DRC, BOM export, netlist export, Gerbers, drill files, STEP, IPC-2581, and GLB output.
      10
      Apache 2.0
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients such as Claude Code to work on KiCad 10 designs by driving kicad-cli for ERC, DRC, netlists and fabrication exports, KiCad's IPC API for live board editing, and lossless edits of schematic and project files. It also provides design review, routing, parts and datasheet tooling so a board can be treated as data and checked against fab limits.
      35
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server that analyzes, reviews, and exports KiCad 9 designs, with live board editing via IPC and a built-in design-review engine.
      47
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      An MCP server that enables AI assistants to analyze schematics, inspect PCBs, trace connections, validate designs, and generate embedded code for KiCad projects.
      39
      129
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools map to distinct actions and resources, so an agent can usually tell list_components from list_nets or pcb_statistics. The slight overlap comes from the SPICE-related tools and analyze_project, which can approach similar territory but are differentiated by purpose and output.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Most tools follow a clear snake_case verb_noun or area_noun pattern: list_*, add_*, pcb_*, simulate_*, run_*. A few names like capabilities and component_pin_positions are noun phrases rather than verb-first actions, but the overall style is consistent enough to navigate.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 18 tools the server is slightly above the typical well-scoped 3-15 range, but the tool set spans schematic analysis, PCB analysis, project creation, and simulation. Each tool has a distinct job, so the larger count is justified rather than bloated.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers project creation, additive schematic editing, net tracing, PCB statistics/connectivity, and SPICE workflows well. However, it lacks update, remove, or move operations for components, wires, and labels, leaving the editing lifecycle incomplete for a design tool.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues