notebook_rename
Update the title of an existing notebook in Google NotebookLM by specifying the notebook ID and desired name.
Instructions
Rename a notebook
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | New title | |
| notebook_id | Yes |
Update the title of an existing notebook in Google NotebookLM by specifying the notebook ID and desired name.
Rename a notebook
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| title | Yes | New title | |
| notebook_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations exist and the description discloses no behavioral traits such as permissions, side effects, or failure modes.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single under-specific sentence, sacrificing clarity for brevity.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
With two required parameters and no output schema, the description fails to provide necessary context for proper usage.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 50%, and the tool description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema for the two parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
Description 'Rename a notebook' is a tautology, simply restating the tool name without adding specificity or distinguishing from sibling tools.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when to use this tool vs alternatives like notebook_add_text or notebook_query.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/moodRobotics/notebooklm-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server