mind_map_delete
Delete a mind map from a notebook by providing the notebook ID and mind map ID.
Instructions
Delete a Mind Map from a notebook
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mind_map_id | Yes | ||
| notebook_id | Yes |
Delete a mind map from a notebook by providing the notebook ID and mind map ID.
Delete a Mind Map from a notebook
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| mind_map_id | Yes | ||
| notebook_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
Description indicates a destructive action but provides no details about consequences, permissions needed, or whether deletion is reversible. No annotations to compensate.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Extremely concise but lacks necessary details. Not a tautology, but too brief to be fully useful.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Without annotation, output schema, or parameter descriptions, the tool definition is incomplete for correct agent invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%. Parameters 'mind_map_id' and 'notebook_id' are not explained; description does not clarify their format, origin, or how to obtain them.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action 'Delete' and the resource 'a Mind Map from a notebook'. It is distinct from sibling tools like mind_map_generate or mind_map_list.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites or constraints mentioned.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/moodRobotics/notebooklm-mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server