esxi_suspend_vm
Suspend a virtual machine on an ESXi host by providing the ESXi device ID and VM ID.
Instructions
Suspend a VM on ESXi
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| vm_id | Yes | VM identifier | |
| device_id | Yes | ESXi host device ID |
Suspend a virtual machine on an ESXi host by providing the ESXi device ID and VM ID.
Suspend a VM on ESXi
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| vm_id | Yes | VM identifier | |
| device_id | Yes | ESXi host device ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden. It fails to disclose that suspend saves VM state, that the VM becomes suspended, or that it can be resumed later. This is inadequate for a mutation operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no wasted words. It earns its place by stating the exact operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
The description is too sparse for a VM suspend operation. It omits prerequisites, effects, and any behavioral context, and there is no output schema or annotations to compensate.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%: both vm_id and device_id are described. The description adds no additional parameter meaning, but the baseline is 3 when the schema fully documents parameters.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Suspend a VM on ESXi' clearly uses a specific verb and resource, and it distinguishes the operation from sibling tools like esxi_power_on, esxi_power_off, and esxi_restart_vm.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites (e.g., the VM must be powered on) or differentiate suspend from power off.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/monthop-gmail/iot-mcp-claude'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server