dss_list_alarms

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It only states the action ('list') without disclosing pagination behavior, filtering options, sorting, authentication requirements, or response format. For a tool with 5 parameters, this is insufficient.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single efficient sentence with no wasted words. It's front-loaded and gets to the point. However, it's too terse to earn a 5, as it could include key details (e.g., required device_id, pagination) without losing conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no annotations and no output schema, the description needs to compensate. It provides only the basic action and platform, omitting details about required parameters, filtering, pagination, or how results are returned. This is inadequate for a 5-parameter tool with complex filtering options.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds no extra meaning beyond the schema; it doesn't mention that device_id is required or explain the date/time filters. The schema already handles this, so a 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific verb and resource: 'List alarms/events from Dahua DSS platform.' It identifies the platform (Dahua DSS), which provides some differentiation from generic list tools, but doesn't distinguish from sibling alarm-listing tools like tb_get_alarms or dahua_nvr_alarms.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. No mention of prerequisites, exclusions, or preferred scenarios. The description is purely functional with no situational context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.