decision_card_well_known_url

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description bears full responsibility. It only states the function without explaining whether it is a pure computation, validates inputs, or makes network calls. No disclosure of return type or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, clear sentence with no extraneous words. It efficiently conveys the tool's core purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description should explain the return value (e.g., it returns the URL as a string). It also lacks details on input validation or error cases. For a simple URL construction, the description is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 50% (only decision_id has a description). The description partially adds context by showing where decision_id fits in the URL but does not describe the 'origin' parameter or its format beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the specific verb 'Compute' and the resource 'AI Procurement Decision Card well-known URL', providing a template with placeholders. It distinguishes from sibling tools like 'agent_card_well_known_url' and 'tool_card_well_known_url' by specifying the card type.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for computing the URL but provides no explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. No alternatives are mentioned, though the sibling tools suggest different operations (fetch, validate, inspect).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.