Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-kinetic-gain

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to operate through a local, signed boundary that blocks prompt injection and secret leakage, verifies outputs, preserves cross-session memory, and provides offline-verifiable receipts. It also exposes 900+ MCP tools for discoverable agent actions.
      7
      MIT
    • F
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to query an air-gapped enterprise knowledge vault via seven MCP tools for deterministic and hybrid retrieval, entity graph traversal, context compression, archive inspection, onboarding scans, and node status.
      7
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to create and verify tamper-evident cryptographic evidence, manage key-bound Agent Passports, and support verifiable handoffs, approvals, and audit trails through MCP, REST, and A2A.
      MIT
    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Cryptographic identity and trust protocol for AI agents. 38 MCP tools across 8 protocol layers: Ed25519 identity, delegation chains, values compliance, signed communication, policy engine, task coordination, cross-layer integration, and agentic commerce. 264 tests passing.
      152
      167 npm
      4
      Apache 2.0

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 75 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool name includes a specific domain prefix and a clear verb_noun structure, making it easy to distinguish between tools even when they perform similar operations (e.g., validate/inspect) across different schemas.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent snake_case pattern with domain prefix (e.g., defensetech_, prompt_provenance_, agent_card_) followed by a verb and noun, creating a predictable and uniform naming scheme.

    Tool Count1/5

    75 tools is far beyond the recommended range, making the server overly complex and difficult for an agent to navigate. The breadth of domains does not justify this many tools; consolidation or modularization is needed.

    Completeness3/5

    The tools cover validation, inspection, and verification for many schemas, but there are no creation or update tools for most document types. The server is complete for its read/validate purpose but lacks write operations, leaving gaps in full lifecycle coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues