dooray_post_log_create

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure, but it only says 'add a comment'. It does not mention that this is a write operation requiring confirm=true, the side effects of the write, or any constraints such as the Markdown-only MIME type. The confirm behavior exists only in the parameter schema, not in the tool description.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, front-loaded sentence with no filler or repetition. It is efficient, though arguably under-specified; still, as written, it is concise and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a write tool with 5 required parameters, a nested body object, no output schema, and no annotations, a one-sentence description is insufficient. Missing context includes the confirm-required workflow, what operation=create_log means, the Markdown-only constraint, and how this tool relates to post-log viewing or updating. The definition is not complete enough for safe autonomous invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 80%, so most parameter meanings are already documented. The description adds little parameter-level value beyond loosely equating the body to a comment, and it does not clarify the required confirm workflow or the operation enum. Baseline 3 is appropriate because the schema already carries most of the parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('add') and resource ('a comment to a Dooray post'), making the core operation clear. It does not explicitly differentiate itself from the sibling dooray_post_log_update, though the create-vs-update distinction is reasonably inferable.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool versus alternatives such as dooray_post_log_update or dooray_post_logs. The intended use case is only implicit in the verb 'add', providing no decision support for an agent choosing among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.