dooray_post_log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'find', which implies a read operation, but it does not state whether it is read-only, what happens if no matching log is found, or what data is returned. This is minimal disclosure for an operation with no annotation support.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is one concise sentence that states the verb and resource directly without filler or unnecessary detail. It is appropriately front-loaded and easy to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The schema fully documents the required parameters and the operation enum, which is good. However, the description provides no information about return values, error behavior, or how this tool relates to the list/create/update sibling tools, leaving an agent with only the minimum viable information to attempt a call.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so all four parameters already have basic documentation. The description adds the clarifying context that logId refers to a comment or activity log, but it does not add meaningful detail beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states a specific action, 'find', on a specific resource, 'a specific comment or activity log of a Dooray post'. This distinguishes it from sibling create/update tools, though it does not explicitly contrast it with the plural 'dooray_post_logs' tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The word 'specific' implies this tool is for retrieving one known log rather than listing or creating logs, but no explicit alternatives or when-not-to-use guidance is provided. An agent can infer the basic use case from the singular phrasing, but clear routing among siblings is absent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.