dooray_account_member

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It only says 'find by id' and does not disclose return format, error behavior, permission implications, or that the operation is a read-only lookup. It is minimally transparent but lacks meaningful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single short sentence with no filler, front-loading the action and identifying scope. It is appropriately concise for a simple tool, though it sacrifices some useful context for brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a two-parameter tool with a fixed enum and no output schema, the description is minimally adequate: an agent can infer that providing a member_id and the find_member_details operation will perform the lookup. However, it omits return-value expectations and alternative-tool routing, leaving some gaps in context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description adds little beyond the schema: 'by id' maps to member_id, but member_id is already documented as 'member id' and operation is documented as 'The operation to perform'. No additional parameter meaning is provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb ('find') and resource ('dooray account members') with a filter ('by id'), making the tool's core purpose clear. It does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling dooray_account_members, but the singular phrasing and id-based lookup imply a detail lookup versus a list operation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description gives no guidance on when to use this tool versus dooray_account_members or other sibling tools. There is no mention of prerequisites, context, or exclusions, so an agent must infer usage from the operation enum and tool names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.