PowerPlatform MCP

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure but offers only the basic operation. It does not clarify that this returns a summary list (implied by 'all'), mention performance implications of retrieving all assemblies, or indicate whether results are filtered by the includeManaged parameter behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence with no redundant words. However, given the tool's three optional parameters and the presence of similar sibling tools, the extreme brevity leaves important contextual gaps.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the output schema handles return value documentation and the input schema covers parameters adequately, the description lacks contextual guidance about the tool's role in the plugin management workflow and its relationship to sibling tools that retrieve complete assembly details or plugin steps.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% description coverage for all three parameters (includeManaged, maxRecords, environment). Since the schema fully documents the parameters, the description does not need to add parameter details, meeting the baseline expectation.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a clear verb ('Get') and identifies the resource ('plugin assemblies') and scope ('in the environment'). However, it fails to distinguish from the sibling tool 'get-plugin-assembly-complete', which likely retrieves detailed information versus this tool's summary list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get-plugin-assembly-complete' or 'get-all-plugin-steps', nor does it mention prerequisites such as required permissions for accessing plugin assemblies.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.