eda_sys_environment_get_editor_current_version

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are absent, so the description bears the full burden. It only states the function and return, without disclosing side effects, error handling, or version format. The signature line adds a hint of the parameter but no behavioral depth.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, with three lines that are efficient and front-loaded. No filler, but the brevity borders on under-specification.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, the description should clarify the return format and the effect of onlySemantic. It only repeats 'editor current version', which is not informative. The tool is simple, but the description fails to explain expected output or parameter semantics adequately.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema describes args and windowId generically; the description adds the function signature with onlySemantic, but does not explain its meaning or usage. This partially compensates for the schema's lack of detail on the actual parameter, but remains shallow.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a clear verb and resource: '获取编辑器当前版本' (get editor current version). It distinguishes itself from siblings like get_editor_complied_date and get_user_info by the resource targeted, but does not explicitly name alternatives.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no guidance on when to use this tool versus other environment getters. No exclusions, alternatives, or contextual conditions are provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.