eda_sch_primitive_attribute_get_all_primitive_id

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries the transparency burden. It discloses the optional parameter, the default scope when omitted, and the returned array of strings. Yet it leaves the meaning of 'parent primitive' unclear and does not mention ordering, empty results, or error behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact and front-loads the signature before the Chinese summary, remarks, and return note. It contains minor redundancy between the signature and the summary, but every section serves a distinct purpose and there is no padding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple getter with one optional parameter, the description covers base scope and return type, and no output schema exists to elaborate further. It lacks an explanation of what a parent primitive is and how this tool relates to attribute_get_all, so completeness is adequate but not comprehensive.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema only provides generic args and windowId containers, so the description's signature is the main source of meaning for the parentPrimitiveId parameter and its optionality. However, it still doesn't explain what the parent primitive is or how the filter behaves when supplied, so semantic coverage is only partial.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly identifies the operation as retrieving all primitive IDs of attribute primitives via sch_PrimitiveAttribute.getAllPrimitiveId, and states the return type. It is distinguishable from sibling get_all_primitive_id tools by the explicit 'attribute' resource, though it doesn't contrast itself with eda_sch_primitive_attribute_get_all.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides one concrete usage condition: omitting parentPrimitiveId returns all attribute primitives on the page. However, it does not state when to prefer this ID-only getter over the full-object getter or mention any alternatives, so usage guidance is implied rather than explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.