Skip to main content
Glama
maxigirl123

storefront-guard-mcp-server

by maxigirl123
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to storefront-guard-mcp-server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • attest-mcp by attestagents

      attest-mcpofficial

      attestagents
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to scan payment endpoints for safety, returning a letter grade (A–F) and verdict before authorizing payments.
      2
      109 npm
      MIT

    • trust-score

      Br0ski777
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with zero-cost, zero-dependency trust evaluation for domains, URLs, wallets, APIs, and IPs, returning a 0-100 score with SSL, DNS, WHOIS, security header, and content sub-scores, plus batch comparison to rank multiple targets.
      MIT

    • scamgate

      odaiameera
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to verify links and payments for scam risk before acting, returning deterministic allow/ask/deny verdicts with scores, reasons, and warnings using local checks.
      3
      1
      MIT
    • Mnemom by mnemom

      Mnemomofficial

      mnemom
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides trust infrastructure for AI agents by enabling reputation lookup, website trust scanning, and identity verification via MCP tools.
      1
      -

    • a2a

      paul-salviani
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to check trustworthiness before recommending URLs, products, or organizations, with fail-closed pass/fail verdicts and attested-only recommendations.
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlap. The tool's purpose is singular and clearly defined, so agents cannot misselect between alternatives.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single tool name 'verify_storefront' follows the verb_noun pattern consistently. With one tool, there are no naming inconsistencies or mixed conventions to evaluate.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has only one tool, which feels thin for a domain that could reasonably include additional operations like reporting a scam or checking verification history. However, the narrow purpose of storefront verification is adequately covered by this single comprehensive tool, making it borderline appropriate.

    Completeness5/5

    For the stated purpose of pre-purchase storefront verification, the tool covers all necessary signals (domain registration, SSL, HTTPS, scam list) and returns actionable recommendations. There are no obvious gaps or dead ends for the defined use case.

    Maintenance

    ActivitySlowing
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources