list_set_cards

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so description carries full burden. It states listing and pagination, but does not explicitly declare read-only behavior, auth requirements, rate limits, or any side effects. Minimal behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences, front-loaded with the action. No extraneous information. Every sentence earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 7 parameters and no output schema, the description is too brief. Missing details on default page/limit, ordering, required code behavior, and exact filter mapping. Relies on referencing search_cards without guaranteeing completeness. Insufficient for correct autonomous invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is low (14%); only 'code' has schema description. Description adds value by noting filters mirror search_cards, but does not detail parameters like page, limit, type, format, rarity, legality. This provides a partial semantic link but insufficient for full parameter understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'List all cards in a set, paginated' – specific verb and resource. Distinguishes from search_cards by being set-specific. However, does not explicitly define 'set' or the required code parameter, leaving some ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Implies that for advanced filtering, search_cards could be used ('Supports the same filters as search_cards'), but does not provide explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance. Pagination mention is helpful but no alternative recommendations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.