delete_price_alert
Remove a price alert by providing its ID to stop tracking unwanted price changes.
Instructions
Delete a price alert by ID. Requires IWMM_API_KEY.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Remove a price alert by providing its ID to stop tracking unwanted price changes.
Delete a price alert by ID. Requires IWMM_API_KEY.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It states the operation is destructive ('Delete') but does not disclose side effects, permissions beyond the API key, error handling, or whether the action is reversible.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Two sentences are efficient and front-loaded with the core purpose. No unnecessary words. Slightly low score for being too minimal, but no fluff.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple delete tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description is adequate but could improve by hinting at return values (e.g., success message) or conditions (e.g., ID must exist).
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema has 0% description coverage for the 'id' parameter. The description only mentions 'by ID' without adding constraints like format, range, or example values.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (delete), resource (price alert), and method (by ID). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like create_price_alert and update_price_alert.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description mentions a prerequisite (requires IWMM_API_KEY) but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_price_alert or no guidance on appropriate contexts for deletion.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/matthewdtowles/iwantmymtg-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server