get_fundraising
Retrieve fundraising pages to access donation records and track campaign performance.
Instructions
Retrieve fundraising pages
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Retrieve fundraising pages to access donation records and track campaign performance.
Retrieve fundraising pages
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are present, so the description should disclose behavioral traits. It does not mention pagination, rate limits, data freshness, or any side effects. The description is insufficient for safe invocation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single sentence, making it concise, but it lacks necessary detail. It is not overly verbose, but the brevity undermines completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema, no annotations, and the existence of related sibling tools, the description is incomplete. It fails to explain what fundraising pages contain or how the results can be used.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has zero parameters, so schema description coverage is effectively 100%. The description adds no parameter info but is not needed. Baseline 4 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description specifies a verb ('Retrieve') and a resource ('fundraising pages'), but it is vague and does not differentiate from siblings like get_fundraising_sales. It is not a tautology but lacks specificity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_fundraising_sales). The description offers no context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/marek-knappe/TryBookingMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server