get_event
Get detailed information for a specific event by providing its event ID.
Instructions
Get details for a specific event
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| eventId | Yes | The event ID |
Get detailed information for a specific event by providing its event ID.
Get details for a specific event
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| eventId | Yes | The event ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description bears full responsibility for behavioral disclosure. It does not mention any prerequisites, permissions, or side effects, which is insufficient for a retrieval tool.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, front-loaded sentence that efficiently communicates the core purpose without any unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given no output schema and no annotations, the description lacks information about return values or any operational context, which is insufficient for an effective tool invocation.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The single parameter eventId is defined in the schema with description 'The event ID', and schema coverage is 100%. The description adds no extra meaning, so baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly indicates the tool retrieves details for one specific event, distinguishing it from list_events which retrieves multiple events. However, it does not specify what 'details' includes, leaving some ambiguity.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus siblings like get_event_session, get_event_sections, etc. The agent has no context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/marek-knappe/TryBookingMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server