get_event_sections
Retrieve all sections for a specific event using its event ID.
Instructions
List sections for an event
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| eventId | Yes | The event ID |
Retrieve all sections for a specific event using its event ID.
List sections for an event
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| eventId | Yes | The event ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description fails to disclose behavioral traits like read-only nature, authentication needs, or output format. Minimal disclosure beyond the operation.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence) and front-loaded with the key action, but for a simple tool this level of conciseness is acceptable.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the simple schema and single parameter, the description is minimally adequate but lacks completeness for usage context, e.g., what sections represent or typical use cases.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% for eventId with a clear description, so baseline is 3. The description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'List sections for an event' uses a specific verb and resource, clearly distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'get_event_session' or 'get_event'.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool compared to alternatives such as 'get_event', 'get_event_session', or other list tools. Lacks context for selection.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/marek-knappe/TryBookingMCP'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server