Skip to main content
Glama
mambalabsdev

mcp-gtm-tech-stack-signal-scraper

by mambalabsdev
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-gtm-tech-stack-signal-scraper

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • hosaka-mcp

      plus8bit
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Company data for AI agents, paid per call in USDC on Base. Returns every third-party vendor a company can be proven to use — CRM, email, analytics, cloud, HR, payments — each with the DNS record or script that proves it. No signup, no API key.
      1
      MIT

    • technographics

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables detecting what a website is built with—such as ecommerce platforms, CMSs, JS frameworks, analytics, and CDNs—by reading the page itself, returning evidence for each detection and listing detection coverage.
      9 npm
      MIT

    • forency-mcp

      cheevahagadog
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to investigate any website's technology stack, identifying CMS, ecommerce platforms, JavaScript frameworks, analytics, CRM, marketing automation, payments, chat, CDN, and hosting.
      -
    • Boolsai by Boolsai-ai

      Boolsaiofficial

      Boolsai-ai
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to live-scan any public site's tech stack and query a pre-indexed directory of ecommerce vendors, account IDs, and quant signals, all without authentication.
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4.1/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool in the set, there is no possibility of misselection or overlapping purpose; detect_gtm_tech_stack has an unambiguous, clearly stated role.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    The single name follows a clean snake_case verb_noun pattern (detect_gtm_tech_stack) that is descriptive and predictable; there are no other names to conflict with it.

    Tool Count3/5

    A one-tool server is thin even for a narrow detection purpose; a batch/detect-many variant or a companion tool for listing supported technologies would make the surface feel complete rather than a single point of call.

    Completeness3/5

    Core detection is covered and the tool is parameterized, but there is no way to enumerate supported technologies, detect multiple companies in one pass, or retrieve the raw evidence behind each flag, leaving agents to guess valid inputs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityActive
    ResponsivenessResponsive

    Resources