technographics
Detects whether a website is served through Cloudflare by identifying Cloudflare-specific response headers such as cf-ray.
Detects whether a website includes Google Tag Manager, while noting that tools injected client-side via tag managers may be invisible without JavaScript execution.
Detects whether a website uses Mintlify by identifying Mintlify-specific emitted markers, avoiding false positives from merely naming Mintlify in page content.
Detects whether a website is built with Next.js by identifying framework-specific markers such as NEXT_DATA.
Detects whether a website is powered by Shopify by recognizing Shopify-specific cookies such as _shopify_y and other site markers.
Detects whether a website integrates Stripe by matching Stripe resources such as https://js.stripe.com/v3.
Detects whether a website is deployed on Vercel by recognizing response headers such as x-vercel-id.
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@technographicswhat platform is example.com built on?"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
@pipeworx/technographics
What a website is built with, read from the page itself. Keyless.
Part of Pipeworx — an MCP gateway connecting AI agents to 1576+ live data sources.
Tools
tech_detect(url)— the stack a site loads: ecommerce platform, payments, CMS, JS framework, analytics, marketing automation, chat, ad pixels, CDN, web server, visitor-identification tools. Each detection carries the evidence that produced it.tech_detect_coverage()— every technology the detector recognises, by category, and what it cannot see.
Related MCP server: tech-stack-detector-mcp
The route taken, and the licence reasoning
We wrote our own signatures. We did not use a Wappalyzer ruleset. That is the whole licence story and it is the part a future maintainer will need:
Project | Licence | What it actually is |
| GPL-3.0 | the maintained continuation of Wappalyzer's fingerprints |
| GPL-3.0 | HTTP Archive's fork of the same |
| MIT | MIT code — its README states it uses data from the two above |
| MIT | same shape: MIT code, Wappalyzer-lineage data |
Wappalyzer relicensed off MIT before going commercial and every maintained fork inherited the copyleft. An MIT wrapper does not change the licence of the database it consumes, so "use the MIT one" is not the escape it looks like.
What src/signatures.ts contains instead is our own expression of publicly observable
facts — that Shopify sets a _shopify_y cookie, that Cloudflare answers with cf-ray,
that Next.js emits __NEXT_DATA__. Those facts are not anyone's property; a particular
curated database of them is. No GPL code or data is used, imported, or vendored.
What that costs: ~167 technologies across 29 categories, where a commercial set covers tens of thousands. That trade is stated in every response rather than hidden.
Two honest limits, carried on every response
JavaScript is not executed. We read the HTML the server returned. Anything a tag manager injects client-side is invisible — and for this category that is a specific, large blind spot, not a rounding error, because tag managers are exactly how marketing tools get installed. A site showing only "Google Tag Manager" may be running a dozen tools underneath it.
Absence is not evidence of absence. A technology missing from an answer may simply be outside the signature set.
tech_detect_coverage()exists so a negative can be checked before it is trusted.
Evidence, not booleans
Every detection returns the string that matched — cookie _shopify_y,
response header x-vercel-id: …, resource https://js.stripe.com/v3. A detector whose
answers cannot be checked is one people stop trusting the first time it is wrong, and
during development this caught a real bug: vercel.com reported Mintlify because the
page merely names Mintlify in a customer logo. Patterns now key on what a technology
emits, never on a product name in prose.
Fetching a caller-supplied URL, safely
This tool fetches an address the caller chose, which is the one shape that turns a data
gateway into someone's proxy into private space. So: http/https only, standard ports only,
and private, loopback, link-local (including cloud metadata at 169.254.169.254), CGNAT
and multicast addresses are refused. Redirects are followed manually with every hop
re-checked — a public URL that 302s to the metadata endpoint is the actual attack, and a
first-hop-only check does not stop it. Response bodies are capped at 1.5 MB.
Source
The live website. No third-party API, no key, no vendor.
Quick Start
Add to your MCP client (Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, etc.):
{
"mcpServers": {
"technographics": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/technographics/mcp"
}
}
}What this endpoint actually serves
tools/list at https://gateway.pipeworx.io/technographics/mcp returns the tools in the table
above plus the shared Pipeworx meta-tools — ask_pipeworx,
discover_tools, search_within, remember/recall and the rest of the
gateway-wide set. So the tool count you see is larger than this table: a
single-pack endpoint currently lists roughly 30 shared tools alongside the
pack's own. The connection's initialize response states its exact scope, and
is the authoritative answer for a given day.
This is deliberate, not multiplexing by accident. The meta-tools are what let a
scoped connection answer a question this pack does not cover — via
ask_pipeworx, which routes across the whole catalog — without you adding a
second MCP server. There is currently no way to mount a pack endpoint without
them; if the extra schemas cost you more context than the routing is worth,
connect to the full gateway once rather than to several pack endpoints.
Or connect to the full Pipeworx gateway to get every pack's tools listed directly, instead of just this one's:
{
"mcpServers": {
"pipeworx": {
"url": "https://gateway.pipeworx.io/mcp"
}
}
}Both URLs reach the same gateway and the same 1576+ data sources. The
only difference is which pack's tools are listed directly; ask_pipeworx
reaches all of them from either one.
No MCP client? Call it over HTTP
curl -X POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/tech_detect \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
-d '{"url":"shopify.com"}'No account needed for the first calls. Inspect any tool: GET https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/tech_detect. Find one: POST https://gateway.pipeworx.io/v1/tools/search_packs with {"query":"..."}.
Standalone (no gateway account)
This package also runs as a local stdio MCP server — no Pipeworx account, no gateway round-trip:
{
"mcpServers": {
"technographics": {
"command": "npx",
"args": ["-y", "@pipeworx/mcp-technographics"]
}
}
}Or run it directly to confirm it starts:
npx -y @pipeworx/mcp-technographicsIt speaks MCP over stdin/stdout and answers initialize/tools/list/tools/call
for only this pack's tools — none of the shared meta-tools the gateway
connection above adds. Same source, same tools, no ask_pipeworx routing.
Using with ask_pipeworx
Instead of calling tools directly, you can ask questions in plain English — this works on the pack endpoint above as well as on the full gateway:
ask_pipeworx({ question: "your question about Technographics data" })The gateway picks the right tool and fills the arguments automatically.
More
License
MIT
This server cannot be deployed
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Detect the technology stack behind any website: frameworks, CMS, analytics, and more from one POST.
Detect the tech stack behind any website: CMS, ecommerce, analytics, CRM, payments, hosting.
Detect 7,500+ technologies on any website - CMS, ecommerce, analytics, frameworks. ~$5/1,000 sites.
Detect CMS, ecommerce, analytics, payments and email hosting for every website in a list.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceDetects a company's technology stack from its public web presence. Returns structured tech signals for sales targeting and competitive analysis.1136 npm1MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceDetects what technologies (CMS, frameworks, analytics, etc.) a website uses by fingerprinting its HTTP response and markup, returning confidence-scored results for single or bulk URL queries.-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceDetects 50+ technologies on any website (CMS, JS frameworks, analytics, hosting, etc.) with confidence scores and evidence, using x402 micropayments.MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to investigate any website's technology stack, identifying CMS, ecommerce platforms, JavaScript frameworks, analytics, CRM, marketing automation, payments, chat, CDN, and hosting.-