geck_cell_view_snapshot

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

There are no annotations, so the description carries the full burden. It does disclose that this is a read operation, which is useful, but it does not mention whether the Cell View must be active, whether a stale snapshot can be returned, or what happens when limits like max_refs and max_cells are exceeded.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

A single, tightly worded sentence that front-loads the operation ('Read Cell View state') and immediately lists the returned aspects. Every phrase contributes meaning and there is no filler or repetition.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a snapshot tool with an output schema, the description adequately names the core return contents, but it leaves parameter semantics and operational context unexplained. Given no annotations and three tunable parameters, a bit more context about backend and limit behavior would make it more complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explain the three parameters. The names 'max_refs' and 'max_cells' are somewhat self-explanatory, but 'backend' is ambiguous and none of the parameters are connected to the described behavior in a way that helps an agent choose sensible values.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description uses a specific verb ('Read') and resource ('Cell View state') and enumerates the key contents: world space, selected cell, visible cells, and current cell references. It conveys the tool's focus clearly, though it does not explicitly contrast it with sibling snapshot tools like geck_object_snapshot.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is given about when to use this tool instead of the many related cell and snapshot tools. The description implies a read-only inspection use case, but it does not state prerequisites, typical workflows, or exclusions, leaving the agent to infer applicability.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.