get_note
Retrieve the full body of a note by its ID to access its complete content.
Instructions
Get full body of a note by id.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Retrieve the full body of a note by its ID to access its complete content.
Get full body of a note by id.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, so the description must disclose behavior. It mentions returning 'full body' but does not specify if the operation is read-only, idempotent, or any side effects. Minimal behavioral disclosure.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, no wasted words. Appropriate length for the simple operation.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Adequate for a basic get-by-id operation, but lacks details on return format, error handling, or relationship to siblings like search_notes. Could be more complete with minimal expansion.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
With 0% schema description coverage, the description adds only 'by id' to the parameter 'id', which is minimal additional meaning beyond the schema's type and requirement.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool retrieves the full body of a note by its id, using a specific verb and resource. It is distinct from siblings like 'create_note' or 'search_notes' that perform different operations.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., search_notes). It implies you need a note id, but no explicit context or exclusions.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/maito-app/mcp-server'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server