create_column

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are present, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It does not mention side effects, authorization needs, idempotency, or potential errors (e.g., duplicate column). This lack of detail hinders an agent's understanding of the tool's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, making it concise. However, it is too concise—it omits critical details that would aid an agent. It could be restructured to include parameter information and usage context without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the simplicity of the tool (2 parameters, no output schema), the description is marginally adequate. An agent can infer the basic operation, but the lack of details on return value, error handling, or column semantics reduces completeness. Sibling tools do not provide additional guidance.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description does not explicitly define the parameters' meaning or usage. The phrase 'in a board' implies boardId, and 'new column (status)' hints at the name parameter, but this is minimal and relies on inference. Baseline score is 3 because schema coverage is low but the context provides some understanding.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (create) and resource (column) with context of board. It differentiates from sibling tools like create_board, create_card, etc. However, it is very brief and could be more explicit about what a column represents.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives, prerequisites, or conditions for use. The description does not indicate when not to use it or suggest alternative tools for different scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.