trademark_registration

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist; description does not mention read-only nature, auth requirements, or side effects. Minimally discloses behavioral traits beyond the basic output type.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two efficient sentences front-load purpose and add key context on authority and fees. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers core output (steps, fees, timeline) and regulatory context. Output schema exists to detail return values, so description is sufficiently complete for an info tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers 100% of parameters with descriptions. Description adds value by linking is_sme to the 50% SME discount and expedited to the AED 2,250 fee, providing context not in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool returns UAE trademark registration steps, fees, and timeline, with a specific verb and resource. The name is self-explanatory and distinguishes well from siblings like ip_protection.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance provided on when to use this tool vs. alternatives such as ip_protection. Lacks context for selection or exclusion.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.