MCP for Vivado
Related Servers
Alternatives to MCP for Vivado
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceA lean MCP server that lets AI agents drive Xilinx Vivado for synthesis, implementation, simulation, and diagnostics through 30 curated tools and raw Tcl execution.Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables AI assistants like Claude to directly interact with AMD/Xilinx Vivado FPGA development tools.4062MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceMCP server for AMD Xilinx Vivado 2023.1 that enables Claude Code to act as an AI FPGA engineer, providing 27 tools for querying, building, simulating, and programming FPGA designs.2-
- FlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that lets AI clients operate AMD Vivado through safe, workflow-level tools while allowing the user to watch and interact with the Vivado GUI.21-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI clients to directly launch, control, and analyze AMD/Xilinx Vivado on Windows and Linux, supporting project management, synthesis, implementation, bitstream generation, timing/resource analysis, and simulation through a persistent Tcl session.34 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceMCP server for deterministic Vivado FPGA automation including project scaffolding, simulation, synthesis, implementation, and gated bitstream generation.4MIT
TDQS
Scored across 15 tools
Most tools have distinct purposes (e.g., workflow CRUD, toolchain management, design intents), but 'cancel_workflow' and 'reject_workflow' could be ambiguous—both involve stopping a workflow but with different semantics. Descriptions are brief but generally clear.
Tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., create_workflow, list_workflows). Minor inconsistency: 'design_block_design' is redundant (block design appears twice), and 'run_simulation' uses a different verb style than 'design_*' intents.
15 tools is well-scoped for a Vivado MCP server covering workflow lifecycle, design intents, toolchain registration, and public methods. Each tool serves a clear purpose without unnecessary bloat.
Covers CRUD for workflows, toolchain registration, and design intents. Minor gaps: lacks update/delete for registered toolchains (only remove), and no tool for listing or managing IP/block designs after creation. Core workflows are complete.