Skip to main content
Glama
lzinga

US Government Open Data MCP

cms_query

Read-only

Query any CMS provider dataset using a dataset identifier. Filter results by any field for targeted data retrieval.

Instructions

General-purpose query against any CMS provider dataset by dataset identifier. Use cms_search to find available datasets and their IDs. Supports filtering by any field.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
dataset_idYesCMS dataset identifier (e.g. 'xubh-q36u' for hospitals, '4pq5-n9py' for nursing homes) or catalog key
filter_fieldNoField name to filter on (e.g. 'state', 'city', 'provider_name')
filter_valueNoValue to filter for
limitNoMax results (default 50)
offsetNoOffset for pagination
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations provide readOnlyHint: true, and description says 'query' which aligns. Description adds general-purpose and filtering context but no additional behavioral details like rate limits or data freshness.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two concise sentences with clear front-loading of purpose and immediate guidance. No unnecessary words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, yet description does not explain return format or pagination behavior despite supporting limit/offset. Missing critical context for a general-purpose query tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds limited value. It mentions 'filtering by any field' which aligns with schema parameters but no new constraints or examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'General-purpose query against any CMS provider dataset by dataset identifier' with specific verb 'query' and resource 'CMS dataset'. Differentiates from specific siblings like cms_hospitals and cms_nursing_homes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly suggests using cms_search to find datasets and IDs. Mentions filtering support. Does not explicitly state when not to use, but implies it's for arbitrary datasets.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lzinga/us-gov-open-data-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server