obsbot_ai_track_speed

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations exist, so description carries full burden. It states the action (set speed) but omits side effects, required system state (e.g., tracking must be active), or whether changes are persistent. The camera parameter is also undocumented in behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence followed by a brief clarification of the enum values. No unnecessary words, front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

While the core function is explained, the omission of the camera parameter and lack of output schema leave the tool's full behavior partially undefined. For a simple setter, it is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The description adds valuable meaning for the speed parameter ('slower follow' vs 'snappier follow') beyond the enum values. However, the camera parameter is not mentioned at all, leaving its purpose unclear.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool sets the AI tracking-speed preset, with explicit enumeration of the two options (standard/sport) and their meanings. It is specific and distinguishes from sibling tools like obsbot_ai_track.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, or when to choose standard vs. sport. The description implies use for adjusting tracking speed but lacks context or prerequisites.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.