Skip to main content
Glama
lumile

LumbreTravel MCP Server

by lumile

reactivate_vehicle

Reactivate a previously deactivated vehicle in the LumbreTravel system by providing its ID to restore availability for travel programs.

Instructions

Reactivar un vehículo.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesID del vehículo a reactivar

Implementation Reference

  • Tool registration and schema definition in listTools() method. Defines name 'reactivate_vehicle', description, and input schema requiring 'id'.
    {
      name: 'reactivate_vehicle',
      description: 'Reactivar un vehículo.',
      inputSchema: { type: 'object', properties: { id: { type: 'string', description: 'ID del vehículo a reactivar' } }, required: ['id'] }
  • Handler implementation in callTool() switch statement. Extracts id from args, calls apiService.reactivateVehicle(id), and returns JSON response.
    case 'reactivate_vehicle': {
      const { id } = args as { id: string }
      const vehicle = await this.apiService.reactivateVehicle(id)
      return {
        content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify(vehicle, null, 2) }]
      }
    }
  • Core helper method in ApiService that performs the HTTP PUT request to reactivate vehicle by id.
    async reactivateVehicle (id: string) {
      const headers = await this.getHeaders()
      const response = await fetch(`${API_CONFIG.baseUrl}/integrations/mcp/vehicle/reactivate`, {
        method: 'PUT',
        headers,
        body: JSON.stringify({ id })
      })
      return await this.handleResponse<any>(response)
    }
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It only states the action 'reactivate' without disclosing behavioral traits: whether this requires specific permissions, what happens to associated data, if there are side effects, rate limits, or what the response looks like. For a mutation tool with zero annotation coverage, this is inadequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While technically concise with a single sentence, this is under-specification rather than effective brevity. The description doesn't earn its place by providing necessary context for a mutation tool. It's front-loaded but incomplete, failing to convey essential information about the tool's behavior and usage.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is completely inadequate. It doesn't explain what reactivation means operationally, what state changes occur, potential side effects, or return values. Given the complexity of vehicle management and the presence of multiple similar tools, this minimal description fails to provide necessary context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with one parameter 'id' documented as 'ID del vehículo a reactivar'. The description doesn't add any parameter information beyond what the schema provides. With high schema coverage and only one parameter, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Reactivar un vehículo' (Reactivate a vehicle) is a tautology that restates the tool name in Spanish. It specifies the verb 'reactivar' and resource 'vehículo', but doesn't distinguish from sibling tools like reactivate_agency or reactivate_hotel. While it indicates the basic action, it lacks specificity about what reactivation entails.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided about when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., vehicle must be deactivated), when-not scenarios, or how it differs from similar tools like update_vehicle or create_vehicle. With multiple reactivate_* siblings, this omission is particularly problematic.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lumile/lumbretravel-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server