Skip to main content
Glama
lumile

LumbreTravel MCP Server

by lumile

reactivate_service

Reactivate suspended travel services by providing the service ID to restore access to travel programs and activities.

Instructions

Reactivar un servicio

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesID del servicio a reactivar

Implementation Reference

  • MCP tool handler implementation for 'reactivate_service'. Extracts 'id' from arguments, calls apiService.reactivateService(id), and returns the JSON stringified result.
    case 'reactivate_service': {
      const { id } = args as { id: string }
      const service = await this.apiService.reactivateService(id)
      return {
        content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify(service, null, 2) }]
      }
    }
  • Registration of the 'reactivate_service' tool in the listTools() method, including name, description, and input schema.
    {
      name: 'reactivate_service',
      description: 'Reactivar un servicio',
      inputSchema: { type: 'object', properties: { id: { type: 'string', description: 'ID del servicio a reactivar' } }, required: ['id'] }
    },
  • Helper method in ApiService that sends a PUT request to the backend API endpoint to reactivate a service by ID.
    async reactivateService (id: string) {
      const headers = await this.getHeaders()
      const response = await fetch(`${API_CONFIG.baseUrl}/integrations/mcp/service/reactivate`, {
        method: 'PUT',
        headers,
        body: JSON.stringify({ id })
      })
      return await this.handleResponse<any>(response)
    }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description carries full burden but only states the action without behavioral details. It doesn't disclose if reactivation requires specific permissions, affects billing or status, is reversible, or has side effects. For a mutation tool, this leaves critical gaps in understanding its behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient phrase in Spanish that directly states the tool's action. It's appropriately sized and front-loaded with zero wasted words, making it highly concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (a mutation with no annotations or output schema), the description is incomplete. It lacks details on what reactivation entails, success/failure outcomes, or how it fits into the service lifecycle, leaving the agent with insufficient context for reliable use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with one parameter 'id' documented as 'ID del servicio a reactivar'. The description adds no additional parameter semantics beyond what the schema provides, so it meets the baseline of 3 for high schema coverage.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Reactivar un servicio' (Reactivate a service) states a clear verb+resource action, but it's vague about what 'reactivate' entails (e.g., restoring from suspension vs. re-enabling billing). It doesn't distinguish from sibling tools like reactivate_agency or reactivate_program, which follow the same pattern for different resources.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It doesn't mention prerequisites (e.g., the service must be deactivated first), exclusions, or related tools like delete_service or create_service for lifecycle context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lumile/lumbretravel-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server