Skip to main content
Glama
lumile

LumbreTravel MCP Server

by lumile

reactivate_agency

Reactivate a travel agency by providing its ID to restore access to LumbreTravel programs and activities.

Instructions

Reactivar una agencia

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesID de la agencia a reactivar

Implementation Reference

  • Registration of the 'reactivate_agency' tool including its name, description, and input schema.
      name: 'reactivate_agency',
      description: 'Reactivar una agencia',
      inputSchema: {
        type: 'object',
        properties: { id: { type: 'string', description: 'ID de la agencia a reactivar' } },
        required: ['id']
      }
    },
  • Handler logic for 'reactivate_agency' tool: extracts id from args, calls apiService.reactivateAgency(id), and returns the JSON stringified result.
    case 'reactivate_agency': {
      const { id } = args as { id: string }
      const agency = await this.apiService.reactivateAgency(id)
      return {
        content: [{ type: 'text', text: JSON.stringify(agency, null, 2) }]
      }
    }
  • API service method that performs the actual HTTP PUT request to reactivate an agency by ID.
    async reactivateAgency (id: string) {
      const headers = await this.getHeaders()
      const response = await fetch(`${API_CONFIG.baseUrl}/integrations/mcp/agency/reactivate`, {
        method: 'PUT',
        headers,
        body: JSON.stringify({ id })
      })
      return await this.handleResponse<any>(response)
    }
  • Input schema for the 'reactivate_agency' tool, defining a required 'id' string parameter.
    type: 'object',
    properties: { id: { type: 'string', description: 'ID de la agencia a reactivar' } },
    required: ['id']
Behavior1/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations provided, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure but offers none. 'Reactivar' implies a state change operation, but there's no information about permissions required, whether this is reversible, what happens to associated data, rate limits, or what the operation returns. This leaves the agent completely in the dark about behavioral characteristics.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness2/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

While technically concise with just three words, this is under-specification rather than effective conciseness. The description fails to provide essential information that would help an agent understand and use the tool correctly, making it inefficient despite its brevity.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness1/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a mutation tool with no annotations and no output schema, the description is completely inadequate. It doesn't explain what reactivation means operationally, what state changes occur, what permissions are needed, or what the tool returns. Given the complexity implied by 'reactivate' and the lack of structured metadata, this description provides insufficient context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with the single parameter 'id' well-documented as 'ID de la agencia a reactivar'. The description adds no parameter information beyond what the schema provides, but with complete schema coverage, the baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description 'Reactivar una agencia' is a tautology that essentially restates the tool name in Spanish, providing no additional clarity about what 'reactivate' entails or what an 'agency' represents in this context. It doesn't distinguish this tool from sibling reactivation tools like reactivate_hotel or reactivate_program.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines1/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There's no mention of prerequisites (e.g., agency must be deactivated), when-not-to-use scenarios, or how this differs from similar tools like update_agency or create_agency.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/lumile/lumbretravel-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server