Get Scaleway bucket website configuration

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint, openWorldHint, idempotentHint, and destructiveHint false, clearly indicating a safe read operation. The description adds value by disclosing the specific error behavior: 'Errors with NoSuchWebsiteConfiguration if none is set.' This is a key behavioral detail beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is exceptionally concise with two sentences, zero waste. The first sentence is front-loaded with the core purpose, and the second sentence adds a critical behavioral note. Every word earns its place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with two parameters, no output schema, and comprehensive annotations, the description is complete. It communicates the operation, resource, and expected error condition. No additional information is needed for correct agent usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% (both 'bucket' and 'region' have descriptions). The description adds no additional meaning about the parameters beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate as the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it reads a bucket's static-website configuration, distinguishing it from sibling tools like scaleway_s3_get_bucket_policy and scaleway_s3_get_bucket_tagging. The verb 'Read' and resource 'bucket's static-website configuration' are specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While the name and context with siblings imply its purpose, there is no mention of prerequisites, when not to use it, or comparison to other get-configuration tools. The error condition is noted but does not constitute usage guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.